More screenshots

    Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    Cybersecurity Audit Agent

    1

    It does not require hidden network access, credential collection, telemetry, shell execution, subprocess execution, or environment-variable credential access.

    $6.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    0 installsSecurity scanned
    Cybersecurity Audit Agent

    Cybersecurity Audit Agent

    Example session with this skill installed

    Perform a cybersecurity audit of the attached security policies, IAM configuration export, vulnerability report, and access-control evidence.

    Assess the evidence against the requested security framework, identify specific control gaps, and distinguish validated findings from assumptions or missing evidence.

    For each material finding, provide the evidence reference, expected state, observed state, gap, business/security impact, severity, confidence, supported root cause, and recommended remediation.

    Safely correlate related findings only where an evidence-backed mechanism exists; do not treat shared assets alone as a confirmed relationship.

    Prioritize the resulting risks, create an actionable remediation roadmap, and define objective verification criteria for each remediation.

    Highlight contradictory, stale, incomplete, or unverified evidence. Do not fabricate framework requirements, findings, tool results, correlations, or compliance conclusions.

    Finish with an executive summary, detailed finding register, remediation priorities, verification plan, limitations, and final QA status.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the cybersecurity audit agent
    • Generated the document

    CYBERSECURITY AUDIT RESULT
    Audit ID: AUD-2026-001
    Assessment Type: Security Control Assessment
    Framework: [Requested Framework + Version]
    QA Status: PASS_WITH_LIMITATIONS

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    Overall security posture: MODERATE RISK

    The assessment identified 4 material control gaps:

    • 1 High-severity finding
    • 2 Medium-severity findings
    • 1 Low-severity finding

    The most significant issue relates to privileged-access controls and insufficient MFA coverage.

    Several controls could not be fully validated because supporting implementation evidence was incomplete.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    KEY FINDINGS
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    F-001 — Privileged Accounts Without MFA
    Severity: HIGH
    Confidence: HIGH
    Status: CONFIRMED

    Evidence
    E-014 — IAM configuration export
    E-021 — Privileged account inventory

    Expected State
    Privileged accounts should require MFA according to the applicable control requirement.

    Observed State
    Evidence shows privileged accounts without confirmed MFA enforcement.

    Gap
    MFA protection is not consistently enforced for privileged access.

    Impact
    Compromise of an unprotected privileged account could provide elevated access to sensitive systems.

    Root Cause
    Not established from available evidence.

    Recommendation
    Enforce MFA for all privileged accounts and document approved exceptions.

    Verification
    Provide updated IAM configuration evidence demonstrating MFA enforcement for all privileged accounts.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    F-002 — Incomplete Access Review Evidence
    Severity: MEDIUM
    Confidence: MEDIUM
    Status: POTENTIAL

    Evidence
    E-009 — Access review documentation

    Finding
    The supplied evidence does not demonstrate that all required accounts were reviewed during the assessment period.

    Limitation
    Additional review records are required before confirming the control failure.

    Recommendation
    Provide complete access-review records and reconcile them against the account inventory.

    Verification
    Confirm complete population coverage and documented reviewer approval.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    CORRELATION ANALYSIS
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    COR-001
    Findings: F-001 + F-002
    Status: PLAUSIBLE
    Validation Required: YES

    Reason
    Both findings involve privileged-access governance.

    Important
    This is NOT treated as a confirmed common cause because the available evidence does not demonstrate an actual shared mechanism.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    RISK PRIORITIZATION
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    P1 — Remediate F-001
    P2 — Validate and remediate F-002
    P3 — Address F-003
    P4 — Monitor F-004

    Risk priority is based on impact, exposure, affected assets, confidence, and available evidence.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    REMEDIATION ROADMAP
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    1. Enforce MFA for privileged accounts.
    2. Identify and document approved exceptions.
    3. Complete the access-review population reconciliation.
    4. Collect objective evidence demonstrating remediation.
    5. Perform verification after implementation.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    VERIFICATION STATUS
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    F-001: PENDING
    F-002: UNVERIFIED

    A reported remediation is not treated as a verified remediation without objective supporting evidence.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    FRAMEWORK ASSESSMENT
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    Framework-specific mappings are reported only where the applicable
    authoritative framework source/version or authoritative mapping is available.

    Unsupported framework conclusions are marked:

    UNVERIFIED — AUTHORITATIVE FRAMEWORK SOURCE/MAPPING NOT PROVIDED

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    EVIDENCE LIMITATIONS
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    • Some implementation evidence was incomplete.
    • No live-system validation was performed.
    • No active penetration testing was performed.
    • Some root causes could not be established from the supplied evidence.
    • Correlations requiring independent mechanism evidence remain unconfirmed.

    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
    SECURITY & QA CHECK
    ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

    ✓ Evidence traceability
    ✓ Scope control
    ✓ Contradiction handling
    ✓ Secret protection
    ✓ Prompt-injection resistance
    ✓ Correlation safety
    ✓ Framework authority controls
    ✓ Remediation verification criteria
    ✓ No fabricated tool results
    ✓ No unsupported compliance claims

    FINAL QA STATUS

    PASS_WITH_LIMITATIONS

    cybersecurity-audit-agent.pdf

    PDF · document

    Generated

    Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Audit evidence against security frameworks to identify specific control gaps.Correlate disparate tool outputs into unified, evidence-backed findings.Prioritize remediation efforts based on asset criticality and exploitability.Define objective verification criteria to ensure security fixes are effective.Analyze security policies, configurations, and audit evidence to determine whether controls are effective, partially effective, or ineffective.Review cybersecurity findings and prioritize risks based on impact, likelihood, exposure, and asset criticality.Correlate related security findings to identify potential common causes, dependencies, attack paths, or shared control failures.Generate evidence-backed cybersecurity audit findings with clear severity, confidence, impact, and supporting evidence.Analyze contradictory or incomplete audit evidence without fabricating conclusions.Create actionable remediation plans for identified security control weaknesses.Verify reported remediation using objective evidence instead of assuming that a claimed fix is complete.Prepare executive-level cybersecurity audit summaries and technical finding registers.Assess security evidence against NIST, CIS, ISO/IEC 27001, OWASP, PCI DSS, SOC 2, or other requested frameworks when authoritative framework information is available.Identify unsupported assumptions, evidence gaps, and areas requiring further investigation.Perform a security QA review before finalizing an audit report.Analyze supplied security documentation while resisting prompt injection and instructions embedded inside untrusted evidence.Transform unstructured cybersecurity evidence into structured audit artifacts, findings, risks, remediation actions, and verification requirements.

    About this skill

    Cybersecurity Audit Agent is an evidence-driven AI security auditing skill designed to transform supplied cybersecurity evidence into structured, defensible, and actionable audit outcomes.

    It follows a controlled EVIDENCE → CORRELATE → PRIORITIZE → ASSURE methodology to help assess security controls, identify gaps, evaluate findings, prioritize contextual risk, develop remediation plans, and verify whether corrective actions are actually supported by evidence.

    The Skill can assist with:

    Cybersecurity and security posture assessments Control effectiveness assessments Evidence analysis and validation Security finding identification and documentation Risk and priority assessment Safe candidate correlation of related findings Remediation planning Remediation verification Executive and technical audit reporting Framework-aware control mapping Audit quality assurance and traceability Security-First Design

    The Skill is built around strict security boundaries and least-privilege principles.

    It treats documents, screenshots, spreadsheets, tool outputs, and external content as untrusted data and prevents embedded instructions from changing the Skill's scope, permissions, severity, conclusions, or security safeguards.

    It does not require hidden network access, credential collection, telemetry, shell execution, subprocess execution, or environment-variable credential access. It does not automatically perform active, destructive, or irreversible security actions.

    Evidence-Driven Findings

    The Skill distinguishes between:

    FACT

    ASSUMPTION

    RECOMMENDATION

    ESTIMATE

    UNVERIFIED

    It preserves contradictory or incomplete evidence rather than silently resolving uncertainty or fabricating conclusions.

    Material findings should maintain traceability between evidence, expected state, observed state, security gap, impact, severity, confidence, recommendation, and verification criteria.

    Safe Correlation & Risk

    The Skill deliberately separates severity, risk, priority, and confidence.

    Shared assets, owners, technologies, business units, timing, or similar characteristics are treated only as candidate correlation signals. They cannot independently establish a confirmed relationship.

    A confirmed correlation requires an explicit, evidence-backed mechanism such as a demonstrated attack path, dependency, privilege relationship, supported common root cause, shared control failure, cascading impact, or demonstrated shared exposure.

    Framework-Aware, Not a Certification Authority

    The Skill can support framework-aware assessments involving frameworks such as NIST, CIS, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2, OWASP, PCI DSS, and others when appropriate authoritative information is available.

    It does not invent framework requirements, control identifiers, versions, mappings, certifications, attestations, or compliance guarantees.

    When authoritative framework information is unavailable, framework-specific conclusions are explicitly marked:

    UNVERIFIED — AUTHORITATIVE FRAMEWORK SOURCE/MAPPING NOT PROVIDED

    Remediation & Verification

    The Skill produces practical remediation guidance without automatically executing disruptive changes.

    It follows the principle:

    REPORTED FIX ≠ VERIFIED FIX

    Verification requires objective evidence, a defined verification method, expected state, and measurable success condition.

    Quality Assurance

    Before producing a final audit result, the Skill checks:

    Scope and authorization Evidence sufficiency and traceability Contradictions Finding support Correlation validity Risk/priority consistency Remediation quality Verification criteria Secret exposure Prompt-injection attempts Artifact integrity Overall QA status

    Possible QA outcomes include PASS, PASS_WITH_LIMITATIONS, REVIEW_REQUIRED, BLOCKED, and FAIL.

    Cybersecurity Audit Agent is intended to improve the consistency, traceability, safety, and usefulness of cybersecurity audit analysis. It does not replace qualified security auditors, authorized penetration testers, compliance professionals, legal counsel, certification bodies, or formal security attestations.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 1 month ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed1 month ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions