Works with the AI tools you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
GitHub Copilot
Gemini CLI+20 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIGitHub CopilotGemini CLI
OpenClaw
Manus
Grok+17 agentsCompetitor Teardown
A structured competitive analysis tool that identifies market gaps by auditing promises, pricing, and mid-tier reviews.
$6
Competitor Teardown
Example session with this skill installed
Analyze Linear, Jira, and the status quo of 'using Slack for tasks'. Focus on the project management space for 10-50 person engineering teams.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the competitor teardown
- Generated the document
I have completed the teardown for the project management space. Analysis was conducted on 21 September 2026, using current landing pages and G2/Capterra review data.
Competitive Teardown: Engineering Project Management
| Competitor | One-line Promise (Verbatim) | Pricing Model | Leading Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | "The desktop tool for software development." | Per user ($8/mo) | Issues, Cycles, Roadmaps |
| Jira | "The #1 software development tool used by agile teams." | Per user ($8.15/mo) | Scopes, Automation, Reporting |
| Status Quo | "Just put it in the Slack channel." | $0 (Hidden cost) | Real-time chat, No context switching |
Review Sentiment Audit
| Bucket | Linear (2-3★) | Jira (2-3★) | Status Quo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missing Capability | 12 | 8 | 45 (Persistence) |
| Friction | 18 (Keyboard-only) | 64 (Config) | 5 (Easy entry) |
| Reliability | 4 | 12 | 2 |
| Support | 2 | 21 | N/A |
The Two Gaps
Gap: The "Config Overhead" Tax.
Evidence: Jira reviews show 60+ complaints about setup friction. Linear is too opinionated for non-engineers.
Who it wins: The 15-person hybrid team (Design + Eng) who finds Linear too "dev-only" and Jira too heavy.
What it costs us: We must build a "Jira Importer" and a "No-Code View" toggle.
Success Metric: 20% conversion rate from "Imported from Jira" workspaces.
Gap: Ephemeral Task Loss.
Evidence: 45 complaints in Slack-heavy teams about tasks "disappearing" in history.
Who it wins: The "Slack-first" startup that has outgrown #dev-updates.
What it costs us: Two-way sync with Slack threads is non-negotiable.
Success Metric: DAU/MAU ratio > 0.6 for teams with Slack integration active.
Sales Battlecard: Linear
- Their Promise: "The desktop tool for software development."
- When they win: Teams of pure engineers who value speed, keyboard shortcuts, and minimal UI above all else.
When we win: Mixed teams where Product, Design, and QA need to collaborate without learning a specialized CLI-style interface.
- Questions to ask: "How much time does your non-technical staff spend trying to find the status of a ticket?"
- Weakest point: High barrier to entry for non-devs; "too cool" for the rest of the business.
Next steps
- Review the "Stop Saying" list: Abandon the "Fast" claim as Linear owns this space; pivot to "Inclusive Speed."
- Schedule a deep dive into the Slack two-way sync API docs.
- Re-run this analysis on 21 December 2026.
competitor-teardown.pdf
PDF · document
Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
What you get
About this skill
The problem
Most competitive analysis produces shallow feature grids that fail to drive strategy. Teams often ignore the "status quo" as a competitor and struggle to identify where an incumbent is actually vulnerable.
What it does
- Identifies the three-ring competitive set: direct, adjacent, and the status quo.
- Extracts verbatim positioning promises and pricing models from public sources.
- Performs a sentiment audit on 2 and 3-star reviews to find validated product friction.
- Maps the "crowded claim" space to identify marketing messages you should abandon.
- Produces two specific, evidenced gaps with clear success metrics for your roadmap.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
General prompts usually return generic SWOT summaries or hallucinated feature lists. This skill enforces a rigorous methodology that focuses on high-signal data like job postings and middle-tier reviews, ensuring you get actionable attack vectors rather than a superficial PDF.
Use cases
- Building sales battlecards that honestly address when you lose and how to flip the script.
- Identifying underserved pricing bands or hated metering units in a mature market.
- Synthesizing public roadmap signals from job boards to anticipate competitor moves.
Known limitations
Requires publicly accessible pricing and review data. Cannot access internal competitor roadmaps or private customer lists.
How to install
Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.
- 1
Download the ZIP
Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.
- 2
Unzip into your skills folder
Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.
- 3
Ask your agent to use it
Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.
Skills folder by agent
Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
30-day refund
Not a fit? Get your money back
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean 12 days ago
- Passed all security checks, Safe to install