Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    AI Paper Mill & Research Integrity Screener

    1

    First-pass screener that flags AI-generated, paper-mill, and fabricated scholarship using tortured-phrase, citation, statistical, and template detectors.

    $29

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    2 installsSecurity scanned
    AI Paper Mill & Research Integrity Screener

    AI Paper Mill & Research Integrity Screener

    Example session with this skill installed

    Screen this abstract for research-integrity red flags before I send it out for peer review: "In this work we apply counterfeit consciousness and profound learning to bosom malignancy classification. Across 10 patients, accuracy was 33.3% (p = 0.000). Our irregular woodland model bolsters the discoveries." Report any concerns with evidence and a concern level.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the ai paper mill

    Overall concern level: HIGH (triage signal, not a determination).

    A. Tortured phrases (STRONG): "counterfeit consciousness" (artificial intelligence), "profound learning" (deep learning), "bosom malignancy" (breast cancer), "irregular woodland" (random forest). Four synonym-swapped technical terms; no innocent stylistic origin.

    C. Statistical impossibility (STRONG): "33.3% of 10 patients" is not achievable — 3/10 = 30%, 4/10 = 40%; no integer count yields 33.3% at N=10. "p = 0.000" reported without a bound. Innocent explanation: transcription/rounding error, but combination is implausible.

    Convergence: two STRONG, independent signal classes (A + C) → HIGH concern.

    Recommended next steps for a human reviewer: request the raw data and exact counts; confirm sample size; verify any cited references online; route to the editor/research-integrity office per venue policy.

    Disclaimer: This is an automated first-pass triage. It identifies signals, not misconduct, and may produce false positives. No statement asserts that any person engaged in fraud.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Editorial triage of new journal submissionsPre-peer-review integrity screeningResearch-integrity office case intakeChecking a preprint or abstract for red flags

    About this skill

    Journals, universities, and research-integrity offices are being flooded with AI-generated and paper-mill submissions, and the available screening tools are still immature. This skill encodes the red flags that experienced integrity investigators look for and turns any compatible agent into a structured, evidence-cited first-pass screener.

    It runs six detector passes over a manuscript, abstract, or review report:

    A. Tortured phrases & lexical fingerprints — established technical terms mangled by synonym-swapping paraphrase tools (e.g., "counterfeit consciousness" for artificial intelligence). B. Citation fabrication & manipulation — hallucinated references, DOI/title mismatches, citation-content mismatches, and coercive self-citation patterns. C. Statistical & numerical impossibilities — GRIM/GRIMMER inconsistencies, impossible percentages, p-value vs test-statistic conflicts, and out-of-range effect sizes. D. Template & paper-mill fingerprints — shared skeletons with swapped topic nouns, placeholder residue, and recycled figures. E. AI-generation stylistic markers — filler scaffolding and hedged uniformity (weighted low; only counts in clusters). F. Metadata & provenance anomalies — affiliation/email mismatches, brokered-authorship language, and version churn.

    Every flag is reported with the exact quoted span, its location, a confidence level, and at least one innocent explanation, then aggregated into a calibrated concern level (LOW / ELEVATED / HIGH) using a convergence-based scoring rubric. The skill is deliberately built as triage, not verdict: it never asserts misconduct, never screens on author identity or nationality, and always ends with recommended next steps for a human reviewer.

    What's included: a lean SKILL.md orchestrator plus a bundled REFERENCE.md containing the detailed detector playbooks, the convergence-based scoring rubric, and a ready-to-fill report template. Designed for editors, peer reviewers, and research-integrity officers who need a fast, defensible, human-in-the-loop first pass before deeper investigation.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    2 installs

    Downloaded by developers to date

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 3 months ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed3 months ago
    Updated2 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions